Retired Judge Andrew Napolitano shared insights on the upcoming business records case involving former President Donald Trump in New York City, particularly focusing on the jury selection process.
Contrary to the belief that the court seeks jurors completely unfamiliar with Trump, Napolitano clarified that the goal is to seat individuals capable of rendering a fair verdict based solely on the evidence presented.
The court aims to find jurors who can set aside any preconceived notions or biases and judge Trump impartially. Napolitano emphasized that this standard applies to any defendant and is essential for ensuring a fair trial.
Regarding the extensive set of questions jurors must answer, Napolitano explained that while some may perceive them as restrictive toward Trump’s side, they also provide an opportunity for his lawyers to identify and exclude individuals predisposed against him. The questionnaire serves as an initial screening tool, allowing for further exploration during the jury selection process.
Napolitano underscored that potential jurors are presumed to have political opinions and biases but are expected to set them aside and evaluate the evidence objectively.
He also addressed Trump’s gag order following criticism of the judge’s daughter, emphasizing Trump’s right to defend himself against public attacks, even if they come from individuals associated with the trial judge.
However, Napolitano noted the importance of documenting any perceived biases from the bench for potentially appealable issues. Napolitano provided valuable insights into the jury selection process and the legal dynamics surrounding Trump’s upcoming trial.
